A Cold Spell by Max Leonard review – from cube to crisis

By William Atkins

In 1946 a young atmospheric scientist named Bernard Vonnegut made a significant discovery. It had already been shown that clouds could be made to produce snow or rain by “seeding” them with dry ice, but Vonnegut proved that an even more dramatic and persistent effect could be achieved with silver iodide. The following year, he encouraged his struggling younger brother to join the same lab, not as a scientist but as a copywriter. It was almost 20 years later that Kurt Vonnegut published his satirical novel Cat’s Cradle, inspired by what he’d seen, in which a tyrant unleashes a synthetic form of ice (“ice-nine”) that causes any water it touches to freeze instantly. The novel does not end happily for the planet or its inhabitants.

Ranging from the last ice age to the Anthropocene, Max Leonard’s beguiling history considers the nature of ice as well as its place “in the popular imagination, how it has inspired literature and poetry, and therefore how we might be being diminished as it disappears”. Its genesis was an experience of jarring but everyday incongruity: sitting in a pub one summer’s evening, ice clinking in his drink, Leonard found himself watching TV footage of “meltwater disgorging into the seas of Greenland”. He was struck by an urge to reconcile what was on the screen with what was in his glass. “My hope is that by bringing ice into a more intimate sphere … the catastrophe happening in remote places will become more tangible – that we might feel more keenly what is being lost.” But A Cold Spell is less an elegy and more a celebration of human ingenuity and adaptability. Ice, for Leonard, is a “radically disruptive substance”, a source of terror and entrapment, yes, but also a matrix of revelation.

“Mankind,” wrote Freud, “under the influence of the privations that the … Ice Age imposed upon it, has become generally anxious.” If that period of deep-freeze was a trauma for our species, it was also, Leonard suggests, a cradle of invention and creativity. In the painted caves of Chauvet, France, he finds the “most visible and famous relics of Ice Age life”. The era also gave rise to the oldest depiction of a human being, in the 40,000-year-old mammoth-ivory sculpture known as the Venus of Hohle Fels.

‘In my time,’ wrote Mark Twain, ‘ice was jewellery; none but the rich could wear it’

As glaciers have receded, the ice has divulged new curiosities. In 1862, a mountain guide whose companions had been killed by an avalanche 40 years earlier was asked to identify a corpse that had been spat out, largely intact, by a glacier near Chamonix. “This is Balmat’s hand,” he said. “I would never have dared to believe that, before I left this world, I’d be given the chance once more to shake the hand of one of my brave comrades.” One hundred and thirty years later, two hikers spotted a body high in the Ötztal Alps. What they took for another lost climber turned out, once it was drilled out of the remaining ice, to be a bronze age hunter preserved for more than 5,000 years. Ötzi, as the corpse was named, was wearing cow’s leather shoes, a coat of sheep- and goatskin and a bearskin hat. In his hand was an axe, and in his stomach his last meal: einkorn wheat and ibex.

Ice exists as geography but also as commodity. For much of the 19th century, frozen lakes were lucrative sites of harvest, with businesses such as the Wenham Lake Ice Company exporting their wares across the Atlantic. In 1973, the Rand Corporation published a proposal to sail “trains” of icebergs from the Antarctic to California with the aim of supplying cheap drinking water. (When it became apparent that nothing short of nuclear power would suffice for propulsion the project was put on the back burner.)

Ice’s ability to arrest decomposition, to freeze time, extended supply chains and allowed for national and imperial expansion. Refrigerated transportation possessed what Leonard calls a “colonising force” across the US west, carrying meat one way and dollars the other. The book introduces us to a cast of ice entrepreneurs that includes Frederic Tudor, who in 1833 sent his first shipment of ice from his native Boston to Calcutta. Ten years later, he was shipping more than 10,000 tonnes of Massachusetts lake ice to India each year. Half of it melted on the way; of the remainder half was unsellable; but the trade was still lucrative enough to make his fortune.

Only as ice began to be manufactured at scale using vapour compression technology was Tudor’s near monopoly challenged. When the American civil war cut off the south from the lake ice of the north, the new ice-making industry flourished. By 1865, New Orleans alone was home to three ice factories. Until that point, just as ice had been a luxury available only to the British in colonial India, in the US it had been the preserve of the wealthy. “In my time,” wrote Mark Twain, “ice was jewellery; none but the rich could wear it.”

It’s slippery stuff. “I own to you, I am extremely at a loss how to give the right idea of it,” wrote the English writer and traveller William Windham in 1744, on first setting eyes on Chamonix’s Mer de Glace glacier. “Thus Windham is confounded,” writes Leonard. We’re no less confounded today. On the day he sold the book to Bloomsbury, Leonard learned he had won a cruise to Antarctica in an Instagram competition. (As he says in his afterword, “it may seem like I went about it the wrong way around”, and his description of the trip does, understandably, feel a bit tacked on.) The ice sheets of Antarctica and Greenland, which contain two-thirds of the world’s fresh water, are melting at a rate of 420bn tonnes a year, a process that has accounted for a third of the global average sea level rise since 1993. Antarctica’s Thwaites glacier has lost 1,000bn tonnes of ice since 2000.

What can these vast events and their corollaries possibly have to do with, say, the history of ice skating or snow machines, or poor Ötzi with his gut full of einkorn gruel? How to reconcile such cosmic discrepancies in scale – between the ice cube and the ice sheet, to return to Leonard’s opening image – may be the biggest question we face. But a cabinet of wonders has its own value, and cataloguing what is being lost is its own form of activism.

CLICK HERE TO LEARN MORE: https://www.theguardian.com/books/2023/dec/21/a-cold-spell-by-max-leonard-review-from-cube-to-crisis

The race to destroy the toxic ‘forever chemicals’ polluting our world

By Senay Boztas

“Forever chemicals” are in our drinking water sources, sea foam and spray, rain and groundwater, sea ice, and even human blood – so now efforts are increasing to detect, remove and destroy them.

With increasing evidence linking per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) with cancers, birth defects and negative effects on the immune systems of humans and animals, pressure is growing to restrict these handy waterproofing chemicals that are in everything from Teflon pans and medical devices to cosmetics and pizza boxes.

According to Nijhuis Saur industries, which has built more than 80 technologies to treat forever chemicals such as the banned or restricted PFOS, PFOA and PFHxS, these PFAS are difficult and expensive to remove and destroy.

“They are called the forever chemicals, because they cannot be removed easily, they don’t break down very easily, so they will persist forever,” said Wilbert Menkveld, chief technology officer, at the Aquatech Amsterdam conference. “And we are talking about very small concentrations: one nanogram per litre is like one glass of cola in a million tankers.”

Even when they have been banned, it is hard to get rid of their lingering traces: water cleanups must deal with different concentrations of pollutants and national limits.

In the UK, there is a guideline of 100 nanograms per litre for individual PFAS in drinking water, while in EU countries such as the Netherlands, the public health institute RIVM advises a maximum of 4.4ng/l. Similar limits have been proposed for six of the chemicals this year by the United States Environmental Protection Agency in a “toxicity index”.

While the EU is working on a broader ban on the chemicals, many are already in the environment. There were no limits for wastewater, said Menkveld.

Dr David Megson, a senior lecturer in chemistry and environmental forensics at Manchester Metropolitan University, said some pollutants were not even being tested for, there was no standard testing protocol for many compounds, and legislation was lagging.

“There is no consistency in approach, especially on a global level,” he said. “The US have committed to doing a studies and testing, within Europe there’s a lot going on – in Sweden in particular – and five years ago in the UK we were really behind the ball. People are doing more routine monitoring, but the number of PFAS we need to be worried about has gone from two, to 17, to 47 and now we could have 14,000. By the time a two-year monitoring programme has been performed, it’s almost obsolete.”

According to journalists and academics contributing to the Forever Pollution Project, there are 20 manufacturing facilities and more than 2,100 sites in Europe that “can be considered PFAS hotspots”.

Last year, Chemours, DuPont and Corteva agreed to pay $1.185bn to settle liability claims from American public water systems over PFAS contamination. The chemical company 3M has agreed to settle similar lawsuits in America, while the government of Flanders and 3M announced a €571m remediation agreement last year, and the Dutch government wants to hold the firm liable for pollution linked to a Westerschelde factory. But even with the cash, cleanups are complex.

The type of treatment currently being used depends on whether the pollutants are short- or long-chain chemicals, as well as their combination and whether the aim is to separate them from the water or also to destroy them.

“The longer the chain is, the better it absorbs; short chains are quite hard to reach, so you need a very selective [technology],” said Menkveld. “You can concentrate PFAS, but you have to have a destruction technology at the end.”

The most feasible and developed technologies, according to a review he cited by Blue Tech Research in March, include nanofiltration or reverse osmosis, using a special membrane to separate out larger particles from drinking water.

Granular activated carbon filtration is another method – although you need to treat the carbon before it can be reused, put in landfill or destroyed – and there are also pricier ion exchange resins to separate and concentrate out the pollutant.

Conventional treatments such as coagulation – adding another chemical to help purify the water – remove only limited amounts, but advanced coagulation using a reactor can do more, leaving PFAS in a sludge.

The options to destroy this concentrated waste include low-energy electrochemical oxidation, supercritical water oxidation – which requires high temperature, pressure and specialist operators – and expensive, high-temperature incineration at more than 1,400C.

“You need to have different solutions each and every time,” said Menkveld.

Scientists are working on more techniques. Dr Madeleine Bussemaker, a senior lecturer in chemical engineering at the University of Surrey, wants to start a first commercial pilot for an ultrasound method, sonolysis, that can completely degrade the strong carbon-fluorine bonds of PFAS into relatively harmless carbon dioxide and fluoride.

“We have seen that ultrasound works with other organics or different cell concentrations: the next step is going to the bigger scale and employing it in real life,” she said. “An American study has shown hydrofluorocarbons around the incineration location: you don’t want to create another pollution stream that you have to deal with later. Sonolysis breaks down those bonds using sound waves.”

But experts are calling for more work globally. In the UK, bodies such as the Royal Society of Chemistry have urged more action, while the Health and Safety Executive issued new recommendations in April. In Europe, the implementation of a new drinking water directive and a proposed PFAS ban are looming.

“Funding, legislation and awareness all go hand in hand,” said Bussemaker. “One of the most alarming things for me is that in order to find a blood sample that does not have PFAS in it, one study had to get blood from [1948-1951 American] Korean war soldiers … it’s not going to go away on its own.”

CLICK HERE TO LEARN MORE: https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2024/jan/04/the-race-to-destroy-the-toxic-forever-chemicals-polluting-our-world

Conservative ‘failures’ have led to more sewage pollution, say water experts

By Sandra Laville

Increased sewage pollution, urban flooding and water supply interruptions are the result of a decade of failures by the Conservative ministers, according to water experts who are demanding an independent inquiry into water be set up by the next government.

The repeated failure of the Tories to implement rules to create “sponge cities” has led to much more visible sewage pollution, more flooding and increasing instances of water being cut off for householders and businesses, they say.

Alastair Chisholm, the director of the Chartered Institution of Water and Environmental Management, said: “These rules should have come in in 2011. They were canned by Eric Pickles in 2015 and we have had 13 years of delays. This has been kicked down the road and what is going on now is the result of that.”

He spoke as the institute published a comprehensive report at Westminster, which calls for the next government to order an independent investigation into water companies, who stand accused of widespread pollution and profiteering, and the regulators, who have failed to robustly control the privatised industry.

“Over 30 years on from water privatisation, with widespread urbanisation and agricultural intensification, a fresh approach – including potential reform of water regulators – is needed,” the report says.

“With levels of trust in water companies impacted by repeated reports of pollution and profiteering, both public and water practitioners want more transparency and assurance that companies are acting in the interest of society and the environment.”

The authors of the report interviewed professionals working in the water and environmental industries. Overwhelmingly, they expressed widespread dissatisfaction over water company ownership and operations. Just 6% of the experts questioned were supportive of a continuation of the current approach to ownership, corporate governance and regulation.

The report calls for the Conservative government to finally implement rules to create sponge cities after a decade in which ministers have delayed and attempted to scrap the plans. Sponge cities are urban zones with multiple areas of greenery, trees, ponds, soakaways, pocket parks and permeable paving to allow water to drain away. They also include measures to store rainwater and runoff, such as widespread use of water butts.

Increased runoff from rainfall overwhelms water company sewage systems, which have not been maintained and improved by water companies as a result of under-investment. The extra water increases the likelihood of raw sewage being discharged, while hard surfaces in towns and cities increase the risk of flooding.

In its latest business plan, Thames Water says by 2015 London had seen the biggest decrease in plant cover in front gardens of anywhere in the UK, with five times as many front gardens with no plants compared with the preceding 10 years.

This increased the burden on sewers and the risk of pollution, the company said.

But the Conservative government has repeatedly failed to implement rules under schedule 3 of the Flood and Water Management Act 2010, which mandated developers to install sustainable drainage systems in new developments. Conservative ministers have argued the requirements will be too costly for developers.

The Guardian revealed last year that at least 10% of donations received by the Conservative party since 2010 came from property developers, real estate tycoons and others connected with the construction industry.

Public outcry over sewage pollution, and revelations about water companies’ abuse of storm overflows to dump raw sewage into rivers, which should only take place in exceptional circumstances, have forced the government to look again at schedule 3. But as yet it has not been made mandatory for developers.

“Sponge cities are not a new concept and are being delivered internationally to manage demands for growth amidst water – typically flood and drought – crises,” the report said.

“In the UK we have our own water crises spanning these same challenges of either too much or too little water, as well as pollution.

“Greening our urban spaces is a win-win approach on all these fronts. We must flip the mindset that treats rainwater as a waste product to be got rid of in the urban environment, into one where it is a treasured resource.”

The report, which polled 4,000 members of the public, found 71% of people in England believed water company profits should be restricted because of performance concerns. Two-thirds said companies made too much profit.

CLICK HERE TO LEARN MORE: https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2024/jan/10/conservative-failures-have-led-to-more-sewage-pollution-say-water-experts

Queensland government faces criticism over decision to replace Paradise Dam 20 years after it was built

By Andrew Messenger

The Queensland government is facing criticism over the decision to spend billions of dollars replacing an unsafe 20-year-old dam before completing a business case for the scheme.

The 3,000-megalitre Paradise Dam was built near Bundaberg in 2005 to serve the surrounding agricultural industry, but it was found to be at risk of collapse in 2019 due to engineering mistakes, including the use of a new concrete construction method.

The state and federal governments had jointly committed $1.2bn to return the dam to its original size after they were forced to lower the dam wall to improve safety. The dam now holds just 42% of its original design capacity.

The state’s water minister, Glenn Butcher, confirmed on Thursday that experts had determined the dam could not be repaired or reinforced. He promised to replace Paradise with an entirely new dam.

Building a new dam is expected to cost significantly more than repairing the existing structure, and there is no timeline or costings for the new project but development of a business case has commenced. It will also require new environmental approvals.

The University of Sydney head of school of civil engineering, Stuart Khan, said committing to the project before knowing cost, timeline, or technical details was repeating the mistakes of the past.

He said there was a familiar roadmap for similar situations, where initial cost estimates are “some sort of guess”, and blowouts escalate, until eventually it is discovered the project is not economically viable and is cancelled. Or even worse – the project is completed, and, like Paradise Dam, built incorrectly and fails.

“We should not be announcing projects – whether that be a new-build, or major repair or whatever – before doing an assessment of what’s involved,” Khan said.

The Bundaberg Fruit and Vegetable Growers CEO, Bree Watson, said they had been told the plan was to build a new dam wall about 70 metres downstream of the current one, which would take “seven to 10 years” to finish.

“This is a devastating blow for farmers,” Watson said. “We don’t have assurances around when water allocations will be available for sale again.

“So it’s a really, really challenging time for an industry which is already on its knees.”

A spokesperson for the state government-owned water provider Sunwater said the new dam would be exactly the same height and capacity as the old one.

Butcher described the decision to replace the dam as a “win for the Bundaberg region” and “a major benefit for agricultural producers”.

Butcher said the $1.2bn committed by the federal and state governments was still available for the project, but conceded the replacement would cost more than the initial budget.

“I don’t think it’s embarrassing at all,” he said.

The opposition MP Deb Frecklington labelled Paradise Dam as “one of the biggest infrastructure fails in Queensland” and a “disgrace”.

Sunwater’s chief executive, Glenn Stockton, said they only discovered that the dam was not up to contemporary standards and would lose strength over time “late last year”.

Stockton said the 60,000 people living downstream of the dam were perfectly safe.

“We have confidence that the dam is safe today. But the issue for us is investing in that dam and trying to rebuild that dam up is not a viable alternative going forward,” he said.

CLICK HERE TO LEARN MORE: https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2024/jan/11/queensland-paradise-dam-damage-wall-replaced-why-concrete-issues

A fossil fuel plant is leaving Louisiana families with ‘barely enough water for your toothbrush’

By Delaney Nolan

Katie Mazarac just wanted to give her daughter a bath.

It was late summer evening, and the small Louisiana fishing community where she and her then 18-month-old live had been plagued by water issues for months. Saltwater from the ocean had been creeping up the Mississippi River since June, making the water in her town undrinkable. At one point, Mazarac had resorted to bathing her daughter in a reusable tote bag, using gallons of bottled water.

By August, Mazarac was used to saltwater coming out of her faucets. But that night, she turn on the bathtub faucet and barely any water came out at all.

“I called my mom, because I thought maybe a water line busted in my house,” she said.

But it wasn’t a broken water line, and it wasn’t just her house; it seemed all of Venice, Louisiana, was dealing with low water pressure, her mother said. “I was just out of the loop, because I hadn’t been on my phone. But she was like: ‘Everybody’s complaining about it right now.’”

This happened at least five more times before October, said Mazarac. The sudden loss of water disrupted personal lives and businesses in Plaquemines parish, a coastal community at the mouth of the Mississippi River. Local leaders told residents to use less water whenever possible.

But all the while, an oil and gas company next door continued drawing millions of gallons of water from the municipal water supply, to construct one of the country’s largest fossil fuel projects ever built.

Public records obtained by the Guardian reveal that in some months between May and October of 2023, the liquefied natural gas (LNG) producer Venture Global used up to a quarter of all water in Mazarac’s beleaguered district.

“We’re being told to conserve water,” resident Jordan Biggs said in September, “but Venture Global is getting to use all the water from our pumping stations to build cement for their big plant. And it’s just really disheartening.”

‘Look for basic human need first’

Venture Global, which is on track to rival Qatar as one of the world’s leading LNG exporters, is not building just another oil and gas project: the massive, multibillion-dollar export terminal in Plaquemines parish is the highest-financed LNG project in history. Amid a historic LNG boom, Venture Global is positioning itself to be the country’s leading LNG exporter, and the new 630-acre (255-hectare) site will be one of its largest terminals.

Construction began on the export terminal in 2021. The project has forged ahead despite Venture Global’s other Louisiana terminal racking up hundreds of permit violations, and even as its own clients, such as BP and Shell, pursue the company for reneging on contracts (CEO Michael Sabel told the Wall Street Journal last month that the company is too “busy winning” to worry about the complaints).

In coastal Plaquemines parish, drought contributed to periodic water pressure issues last year from June to November. That in turn shut off air conditioners and hot water heaters, threatened to break machinery, and sometimes forced schools and the local daycare to close.

In September, a student told local news channel WDSU they’d been out of school three times the previous week due to water issues, and couldn’t flush toilets or wash their hands. High school student Emma Hotard said that during the outages, “the most difficult part was the AC”, since low water pressure meant the chillers didn’t work amid Louisiana’s hottest summer ever.

“Some days at school were extremely hot,” Hotard said. “Trying to do work in the heat was very frustrating for everyone.”

Jeff DiMarco, head of the Plaquemines public service department, confirmed in an October interview that Plaquemines’ water demand was exceeding supply. He added that the upriver treatment plant was “at maximum capacity” and being pushed to its limits.

Asked about the LNG terminal’s water use exacerbating water shortages, DiMarco said he didn’t know Venture Global’s usage rates offhand.

Public records confirm that Venture Global was, in fact, consistently the largest consumer of water in the Port Sulphur water district. Venture Global was the top commercial water user in the district in July, August and September. Venture Global’s only project in Plaquemines so far has been construction of its LNG terminal.

But the proportion of the local water supply used to fuel construction of the LNG terminal could be even higher when considering the local companies providing services for Venture Global.

For example, a concrete company has consistently been the second highest commercial user of water in the neighboring Belle Chasse water district. An employee of the concrete company at that address confirmed that their primary client in Plaquemines parish is Venture Global.

John Sabo, a water resources expert at the Bywater Institute at Tulane University, echoed the sentiments of some residents, saying: “Whenever you have a water shortage, you have got to look for basic human need first.”

Summer effects

While construction on Venture Global’s new terminal soldiered on, residents said that their water wasn’t potable even as their water bills increased.

On 14 August 2023, the parish government issued “an urgent plea” on its official Facebook page, addressed to “all residents, requesting their immediate engagement in curbing their water usage”. Citing “a surge in water demand”, the notice asked residents to take shorter showers, reuse water and “postpone non-essential activities that require high water usage”.

That same month, Venture Global used over 1m gallons (3.8m liters) of water, or 13% of the water in the district.

In fact, the proportion rose as the crisis deepened. In September – when South Plaquemines high school closed for multiple days due to low water pressure – Venture Global used 24% of all the water consumed in the shared water district.

Construction on Venture Global’s LNG terminal has been a highly water-intensive process – even higher, it seems, than the company initially estimated. In October, Venture Global used over 3.5m gallons (13.2m liters) of water according to public records, suggesting the company exceeded the maximum projected use of 100,000 gallons (379,000 liters) of water per day reported in their environmental assessment.

In a 15 October 2023 letter to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Ferc), local advocates urged the commission to deny a certification for Venture Global, as their “industrial use of water is unconscionable given that local people do not have water for our basic needs”.

But a few days after the 15 October complaint, parish president Keith Hinkley wrote to Ferc in response, saying that “Venture Global’s water consumption from the Parish supply has been truly insignificant” and that the company has been “a great neighbor”.

The next day, Venture Global received Ferc approval to increase their workforce and construction schedule.

In all likelihood, construction of the LNG terminal has already surpassed the maximum total of 11m gallons (42m liters) of water the company predicted in its environmental impact statement to Ferc. From May to October 2023, Venture Global used at least 10m gallons (39m liters) of water.

This overage becomes much more significant when considering water used by other companies for the terminal’s construction, and the project’s thousands of construction workers.

If the water used by the concrete company in neighboring Belle Chasse can be attributed to Venture Global, then the terminal construction project has used 25m gallons (95m liters) – more than twice its total projected use – in just six months.

Venture Global did not respond to a request for comment.

Effects on residents

From July to November, harbor workers in Buras, Louisiana, reported water pressure issues that threatened to damage equipment, like the costly ice machines needed to keep their shrimp catch fresh.

“Because of the low water pressure – you can burn your whole machine up with that,” said dock worker Derek Ditcharo.

Though the water pressure improved towards the end of the year, through the late summer and fall, “you’d try to brush your teeth at the end of the night, and you barely have enough water to put on your toothbrush”, he said.

Water expert Shirley Clark explained that some of the construction processes, like dust suppression, can be much less water-intensive “if you aren’t in a rush” and are willing to use recycled water rather than pulling from fire hydrants, as Venture Global does. But the company has cornered the LNG export market by virtue of its breakneck construction speed: it claims to hold the record for fastest greenfield LNG terminal ever constructed.

Representatives of Plaquemines parish’s public works department and Inframark (the contractor handling water infrastructure) attributed the problems to extreme heat, drought and subsidence, which is breaking water mains. DiMarco said they’re “having conversations with consultants to increase new water plants or increase the capacity”. Those conversations, he said, include Venture Global. The company has received over $800m in tax breaks from the state .

By October, the parish repaired one of its downed treatment plants, easing pressure on the water supply.

But as the climate crisis accelerates, saltwater intrusion is expected to increasingly impact Plaquemines – and coastal areas across the country – while making severe drought more common. DiMarco indicated that the water problems will likely be occurring more frequently. He also said that Venture Global’s water demands are expected to grow.

DiMarco told the Guardian that the public services department had not been prioritizing residential users, nor putting restrictions into place, but instead was asking residents to conserve when watering their lawns: “Just keep it at a bare minimum while we get through this.”

CLICK HERE TO LEARN MORE: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/jan/12/louisiana-water-crisis-fossil-fuel-plant-venture-global-lng

South West Water ‘not honest’ about drought preparations, watchdog claims

By: Helena Horton

South West Water has been accused of not being honest with the government about its drought preparations after parts of the country almost ran out of water in 2022, it has emerged.

The Environment Agency (EA) told the water industry regulator Ofwat that SWW was “not honest” with regulators about the risk a drought posed to the company’s water supplies and was inadequately prepared for the heatwave.

People in Devon and Cornwall were affected by months of hosepipe bans as reservoirs ran dangerously low during the dry spell in 2022. Three of SWW’s reservoirs fell to record lows during the drought.

The agency said the company showed complacency before the drought and “a lack of understanding of their own supply system”.

Documents obtained by Greenpeace’s investigations website Unearthed under freedom of information laws revealed the environmental watchdog’s scathing assessment of the water company’s drought preparedness. “SWW were not honest, open and transparent with regulators about their drought projections and potential risks to security of supply,” the EA wrote in a July email to Ofwat. The email said “SWW acted too late” in response to the drought, and that this “presented a genuine risk of loss of supply in west Cornwall”.

The EA said the company had a misunderstanding of its own supplies and thought it had so much water that it could pipe it to other regions. The agency told Ofwat SWW that showed “a lack of understanding of their own supply system, considering themselves as a potential water donor in the future, only to find the reverse is true”. The company’s latest plan states that it needs to close a gap of more than 200m litres of water a day by 2050 to meet demand.

Water was so scarce in 2022 that drastic saving measures banning all non-critical use were almost put in place. This would have meant a ban on ponds and swimming pools being refilled, people washing their cars and non-residential buildings being cleaned.

No new reservoirs have been built in the UK since the water industry was privatised in 1989, and some water companies have added to their profits by selling off existing facilities. Water companies have paid out £72bn in dividends since privatisation, borrowing £56bn and increasing bills by 40%.

The EA told Ofwat that new water sources need to “be considered, applied for and permitted during the drought instead of planned in advance”.

Megan Corton Scott, a political campaigner for Greenpeace UK, said: “South West Water have failed in tackling the sewage crisis, failed to prepare for drought, failed to even understand their own supply system and failed to be honest with the regulator, but they did succeed in raising shareholder dividends at the end of last year.

“Rishi Sunak promised tough enforcement and a more resilient water infrastructure. Given this platform of incompetence and blatant money grabbing, how long can the government stand idly by and let this company continue to control such a critical part of the nation’s resources?”

A spokesperson for SWW said: “We strongly reject any suggestion that we were not adequately prepared for the risk of drought or that we did not operate in good faith with the regulators.

“Despite facing a once-in-a-generation drought in the south-west, no customer went without water supply and we successfully maintained a robust supply of water to over 3.5 million customers and 10million visitors to the region.”

The company was fined over illegal dumping of sewage last year after investigations by the EA.

Last week, the owner of SWW, Pennon Group, bought Sutton and East Surrey Water in a deal worth £380m.

CLICK HERE TO LEARN MORE: https://www.theguardian.com/business/2024/jan/15/south-west-water-drought-preparations-devon-cornwall

South West Water ‘not honest’ about drought preparations, watchdog claims

By Helena Horton

South West Water has been accused of not being honest with the government about its drought preparations after parts of the country almost ran out of water in 2022, it has emerged.

The Environment Agency (EA) told the water industry regulator Ofwat that SWW was “not honest” with regulators about the risk a drought posed to the company’s water supplies and was inadequately prepared for the heatwave.

People in Devon and Cornwall were affected by months of hosepipe bans as reservoirs ran dangerously low during the dry spell in 2022. Three of SWW’s reservoirs fell to record lows during the drought.

The agency said the company showed complacency before the drought and “a lack of understanding of their own supply system”.

Documents obtained by Greenpeace’s investigations website Unearthed under freedom of information laws revealed the environmental watchdog’s scathing assessment of the water company’s drought preparedness. “SWW were not honest, open and transparent with regulators about their drought projections and potential risks to security of supply,” the EA wrote in a July email to Ofwat. The email said “SWW acted too late” in response to the drought, and that this “presented a genuine risk of loss of supply in west Cornwall”.

The EA said the company had a misunderstanding of its own supplies and thought it had so much water that it could pipe it to other regions. The agency told Ofwat SWW that showed “a lack of understanding of their own supply system, considering themselves as a potential water donor in the future, only to find the reverse is true”. The company’s latest plan states that it needs to close a gap of more than 200m litres of water a day by 2050 to meet demand.

Water was so scarce in 2022 that drastic saving measures banning all non-critical use were almost put in place. This would have meant a ban on ponds and swimming pools being refilled, people washing their cars and non-residential buildings being cleaned.

No new reservoirs have been built in the UK since the water industry was privatised in 1989, and some water companies have added to their profits by selling off existing facilities. Water companies have paid out £72bn in dividends since privatisation, borrowing £56bn and increasing bills by 40%.

The EA told Ofwat that new water sources need to “be considered, applied for and permitted during the drought instead of planned in advance”.

Megan Corton Scott, a political campaigner for Greenpeace UK, said: “South West Water have failed in tackling the sewage crisis, failed to prepare for drought, failed to even understand their own supply system and failed to be honest with the regulator, but they did succeed in raising shareholder dividends at the end of last year.

“Rishi Sunak promised tough enforcement and a more resilient water infrastructure. Given this platform of incompetence and blatant money grabbing, how long can the government stand idly by and let this company continue to control such a critical part of the nation’s resources?”

A spokesperson for SWW said: “We strongly reject any suggestion that we were not adequately prepared for the risk of drought or that we did not operate in good faith with the regulators.

“Despite facing a once-in-a-generation drought in the south-west, no customer went without water supply and we successfully maintained a robust supply of water to over 3.5 million customers and 10million visitors to the region.”

The company was fined over illegal dumping of sewage last year after investigations by the EA.

Last week, the owner of SWW, Pennon Group, bought Sutton and East Surrey Water in a deal worth £380m.

CLICK HERE TO LEARN MORE: https://www.theguardian.com/business/2024/jan/15/south-west-water-drought-preparations-devon-cornwall

Barcelona Raises Water Bills Due to Long-Running Drought

By: Joan Faus

BARCELONA (Reuters) – Water bills will rise sharply in Barcelona and neighbouring cities due to a long-running drought in Spain’s northeast as the costs of desalination and water purification rise, the Barcelona Metropolitan Area said on Tuesday.

Bills will increase by 11-16% in 23 municipalities, including Spain’s second-largest city.

Since September last year, rainfall in Spain has been around 17% below the 30-year average, and some reservoirs in Catalonia in the northeast and Andalucia in the south are only 15% full.

The southern cities of Sevilla and Malaga have already announced water bill hikes this year, while charges in the Barcelona area had remained mostly unchanged in recent years.

As Catalonia endures its worst recorded drought, officials announced last week that part of the region, including Barcelona, was entering a pre-emergency phase.

Permitted water consumption was reduced to 210 litres a day per resident from 230.

Fresh water now requires more treatment because rivers have become sluggish, and the output of costly desalination plants has been boosted.

Arrangements are being made to allow deliveries by ship if necessary, and new desalination plants are to be built.

CLICK HERE TO LEARN MORE: https://www.usnews.com/news/world/articles/2023-11-28/barcelona-raises-water-bills-due-to-long-running-drought

Afghanistan Excluded From COP28 as Climate Impacts Hit Home

By: Gloria Dickie and Charlotte Greenfield

DUBAI (Reuters) – Humanitarian concerns have been raised over Afghanistan being left out of United Nations climate negotiations for a third year in a row, as the country grapples with worsening drought and floods.

Dozens of people were killed in Afghanistan, one of the world’s most vulnerable countries to climate change, after heavy rains triggered flash floods that swept across drought-stricken land earlier this year.

But the country is absent from the COP28 climate summit in Dubai, having been left out of such U.N. talks since the Taliban took over Kabul in 2021.

No foreign government has formally recognised Taliban leadership, and it does not have a seat at the U.N. General Assembly.

Foreign officials have cited the Taliban’s restrictions on women as the reason for current isolationist policies, particularly its barring of girls and women from high school and universities.

However, some have questioned the country’s continued exclusion. Humanitarian and international officials told Reuters they made efforts this year to allow Afghan representatives to be able to attend, coinciding with broader talks among foreign governments and multilateral institutions on how to deal with the Taliban.

Though ultimately unsuccessful, “there’s hope that maybe next year you might see engagement with Afghanistan in some capacity again,” said Qiyamud Din Ikram of the nonprofit Refugees International on the sidelines of the COP28 summit.

IMPACT ON WOMEN

The U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC)’s COP Bureau, which is responsible for accrediting parties to the annual summits, decided at a November 2022 meeting to defer a decision on future Afghanistan representation.

The Taliban administration has called its COP28 exclusion “regrettable”.

“Efforts were made to have the representatives of Afghanistan participate in the 28th U.N. Climate Change Conference…but no positive response was received,” said Rouhullah Amin, head of climate adaptation at the country’s National Environmental Protection Agency (NEPA), now run by the Taliban.

A senior U.N. source said U.N. and other international officials had made efforts in recent months to get NEPA officials and other Afghan representatives present at COP28.

The UNFCCC did not respond to a request for comment on Afghanistan’s lack of participation at COP28.

In rural Afghanistan, women are responsible for fetching water for their families, an increasingly difficult task as the country struggles with drought.

Women make up many of the 20 million Afghans facing severe food insecurity, exacerbated by declining food aid as governments slash Afghanistan’s humanitarian funding.

Some nonprofits have said isolationist policies can further hurt women.

Payvand Seyedali, Afghanistan’s country director for nonprofit Women for Women International, said: “We don’t have the luxury of not engaging with the de facto authorities in Afghanistan.”

The Taliban say they respect women’s rights in line with their interpretation of Islamic law.

Others said Afghan women feel disengagement is appropriate until the Taliban rolls back restrictions.

“Every time they see the Taliban being welcomed in foreign capitals, it sends a message that their (women’s) rights do not matter to the rest of the world,” said Heather Barr of Human Rights Watch.

FROZEN FINANCES

The Taliban’s takeover of government institutions has also meant that Afghanistan is unable to access key U.N. climate funds, including the Green Climate Fund (GCF).

GCF spokesperson Stephanie Speck said the fund no longer had a recognized focal point in Afghanistan following the COP Bureau’s 2022 decision.

The GCF had approved nearly $18 million for a sustainable energy project in Afghanistan before the Taliban’s takeover. That project has now been “put on hold to allow for a full review of current and emerging risks”, Speck said.

Other proposals that the previous Afghan government had been working on sought more than $750 million, including for projects to improve irrigation and deploy rooftop solar panels in Kabul. They, too, have been postponed, according to a NEPA document seen by Reuters.

RENEWED DIALOGUE

Some have questioned the isolationist approach to the Taliban. A report on Taliban engagement, commissioned by the U.N. Security Council, concluded last month that “the status quo of international engagement is not working”.

It recommended expanding international cooperation on climate adaptation and response.

“Conversations with the Taliban on climate change adaptation could potentially be a confidence building measure,” said Paul Klouman Bekken, Norway’s charge d’affaires for Afghanistan who regularly meets Taliban officials in Kabul.

Roza Otunbayeva, who heads the U.N. mission in Afghanistan, called the situation “unsustainable.”

“It is time to think creatively, to ensure that in one year’s time we are not approaching COP29 with yet another statement on Afghanistan’s absence.”

CLICK HERE TO LEARN MORE: https://www.usnews.com/news/world/articles/2023-12-11/afghanistan-excluded-from-cop28-as-climate-impacts-hit-home

Danone Must Face Evian Water ‘Carbon Neutral’ Lawsuit

By: Jonathan Stempel

 A judge in New York ruled on Wednesday that Danone must face a lawsuit challenging its “carbon neutral” claim on bottles of Evian spring water.

Consumers in the proposed class action said they would not have bought Evian had they known that Danone’s manufacturing process allowed the release of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere or otherwise caused pollution.

In a 30-page decision, U.S. District Judge Nelson Roman in White Plains, New York, called “carbon neutral” an ambiguous term that confuses consumers, and said Danone “expects too much” for them to learn what it meant from Evian’s labels.

The plaintiffs, Stephanie Dorris of California and John Axiotakis of Massachusetts, said they paid premium prices for Evian in 2022, mistakenly believing that the “carbon neutral” claim meant the water was more environmentally friendly.

Roman said the plaintiffs may pursue fraud, unjust enrichment and breach of express warranty claims, and claims under California and Massachusetts consumer protection laws.

He dismissed claims under comparable New York laws, but said the plaintiffs may amend their complaint.

Neither Danone nor its lawyers immediately responded to requests for comment. Lawyers for the plaintiffs did not immediately respond to similar requests.

Danone’s products also include Dannon, Oikos and Activia yogurt.

The lawsuit is among hundreds of proposed class actions filed annually against food producers, often challenging the precision of their labels.

Dorris and Axiotakis had cited Merriam-Webster’s dictionary defining “carbon neutral” as “having or resulting in no net addition of carbon dioxide to the atmosphere.”

Danone said its use of the term reflected a certification from the independent Carbon Trust, and that the plaintiffs’ view defied science and common sense.

Roman called it premature to decide who was right.

“Rather than possessing a common, everyday meaning, the term ‘carbon neutral’ is more technical and scientific,” he wrote. “Consumers thus may reasonably become confused … if it has not previously been explicitly defined for them – as in, before seeing it on the product’s label.”

Danone is based in Paris. Its North American headquarters are in White Plains.

The case is Dorris et al v Danone Waters of America, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, No. 22-08717.

CLICK HERE TO LEARN MORE: https://money.usnews.com/investing/news/articles/2024-01-10/danone-must-face-evian-water-carbon-neutral-lawsuit